Monday, March 31, 2014

The Mann Act

The Mann Act
By: Dina Pobudanovic

     In the early 20th century when “young, single women moved to the city and entered the workforce they were no longer protected by the traditional family-centered system of courtship.”[1] There was a decline of morality as women began working in “tenement houses and factories” to be able to support themselves, which led to an increase in prostitution.[2] Because of this, on June 25, 1910, Congress passed a new law called the Mann Act but it was also known as the White Slave Traffic Act. James Robert Mann was credited with the authorship of this law. “The law made it illegal to transport any girl or women across state lines for any immoral purpose.”[3] Its primary intent was the address prostitution, immorality, and human trafficking. However, it was also used to criminalize forms on consensual sexual behavior.[4] Women had to sign a “Safety Certificate” that explained who she was and who she was having sex with, where they were having sex, and when they were having sex. If this certificate was not filled out then people had probable means to suspect that the sex was not consensual.

     A very popular story dealing with the Mann Act had to do with the infamous boxer Jack Johnson. He had been suspected Johnson had violated the act but it wasn’t until October 11, 1912, “when Mrs. F. Cameron-Falconet came to Chicago, accusing Johnson of kidnapping her daughter, Lucille Cameron.”[5] Johnson was arrested under kidnapping charges and began building a case against him. However, Lucille Cameron “would not cooperate” and admitted she “had been a prostitute before she left Milwaukee and had been in Chicago for more than three months before she'd first met Johnson.”[6] The case got dismissed and the two were married shortly after. After further investigation, the assistant US district attorney found a woman named Belle Schreiber whose “bitterness at Johnson's treatment of her made her just the witness investigators were looking for.”[7] He was charged with many counts of illegal transportation and prostitution across state lines. He was sentenced to a year and a day in jail but fled with his wife for the next several years. Eventually, on July 9, 1921, he finally turned himself in and served his sentence.[8]
     In the most recent years, the Mann Act has never been repealed but it has been amended. “It was amended by congress in 1978 and again in 1986 and applied only to transport for the purpose of prostitution or illegal sexual acts.”[9] Since then most of the cases have had to do with child trafficking which is a whole other topic to discuss in the future.




[1] "Knockout: The Mann Act." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/unforgivableblackness
[2] "Knockout: The Mann Act." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/unforgivableblackness

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Effect of Porn on Relationships

Effects of Porn on Relationships
Josh Shapiro

We all know the statistics of Porn showed to us by Professor Moore and those are clearly scary but what none of us truly know is the effect that porn can have on relationships.  We know that porn brings in 57 billion dollars in commission every year, porn is 12% of all websites, 25% of search engine searches are pornographic, blah blah blah.  More importantly, porn is ruining sexual relationships between couples and straining relationships between kids and their parents.  It has been researched that some men who watch extreme amounts of porn develop SADD (sexual attention deficit disorder)  This means unless they are masturbating, they get extremely bored with their sex lives.
Porn also makes a man think differently when they are with a women.  They are used to seeing such explicit material they think that the women they are with are ok with all of it when in reality this is just making demands on the women higher and this is not what anybody wants in a sexual time.  This is probably where the onanism scare came from.  Men started visualizing other women besides their wives and thought that this was due to too much in their head during masturbation.  Porn can only make this much worse for men now-a-days.  Relationships do not only include interactions with a person our age like a girlfriend or wife, it can also include children.  Porn has had a large effect on children due to the fact that porn's largest viewing population is from the ages 12-17.
Also according to our class discussion, 11 year olds is when a lot of young kids also start watching porn and that scares me because I truly do not think I knew what sex was when I was 11.  I also found out that a study went out about children watching porn and it says that all boys by the age of 13 have been exposed to porn and two-thirds of girls had.  That is a scary statistic because 13 years old should not come with watching porn.  Finally, the affects of porn on children is that it develops a mental image of how sexual acts will be even at the young age of 11.  This is also scary because porn is becoming a social norm and it is becoming "ok" for children these to watch.  At first in our class discussion, I was completely for porn but now that I am thinking and have done all of this research, I am truly scared and do not think it is a good think anymore.

1.     Ask Men. “Too Much Internet Porn: The SADD Effect.” Last modified March 12, 2012. Ian Kerner. http://www.askmen.com/dating/love_tip_500/566b_too-much-internet-porn-the-sadd-effect.html
2.     The Resurgence. “7 Negative Effects of Porn.” Last modified April 8, 2013. Bj Stockman. https://theresurgence.com/2011/11/19/7-negative-effects-of-porn
3.     Net Nanny. “Damaging Effects of Internet Porn.” Last modified March 13, 2013. Jill Dickens. http://www.netnanny.com/blog/the-damaging-effects-of-internet-pornography/
4.     NY Times. “Does Porn Hurt Children” Last modified March 28, 2014. David Segal. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/29/sunday-review/does-porn-hurt-children.html
5.     Philly. “What’s The Impact of Porn on Kids?” Last modified October 22, 2013. Janet Rosenzweig. http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/healthy_kids/Whats-the-impact-of-porn-on-kids.html?c=r

Masturbation Scare by Brandon Russell




Since the 1850s and early world war two, male chastity belts were produced for the sole purpose to prevent masturbation for health. It was believed that if you masturbated too much it could cause different types of cancer, insanity, blindness, and death[i]. This is also why circumcision became so popular. There was a campaign that ran in the early 1900s that promoted circumcision helping stop masturbation.  About 50 to 60 percent of children were being circumcised at this time, which is about the same as today[ii]. For the boys who were not circumcised, they were threatened to be circumcised if they did not stop themselves. Some doctors were known to have also tried pharmacological methods of depressant drugs to prevent masturbation[iii]. However, it was seen as ineffective or too extreme so the practice was discontinued. In the eighteenth century, more Christian related publication was released to prevent masturbation. There were publications such as, “The anonymous Onania” and “The heinous sin of self-pollution”[iv]. Historians have said that much of the medical analysis of masturbation was just moral exhortation disguised as medical rhetoric, obviously. However there are many more “treatments” that were used that are even more horrific. Such as, as infibulation of the foreskin, vasectomy, cauterization of the urethra, insertion of electrodes into the penis or anus, puncturing the prostate with needles, castration and circumcision. Ironically, people would get diseases from these procedures[v]. Doctors went on to continue blaming it on too much masturbation instead of admitting their own incompetence.  At this time they did not have the medicine to cure these diseases anyways.  There has been a recording of this going on for children up into the age of twenty three. One twenty three year old was diagnosed with masturbatory insanity and was sent to a mental institution. Where he was then put in a straitjacket for two months and finally had an operation. After that he was released, he did not masturbate for four months[vi]. In the eighteenth century, there was a lot of masturbatory phobia because people knew the consequences of masturbating were brutality in order to cure them, such as, this and circumcision without anesthetic. It almost appears that the chastity devices would have been lighter and better to be prescribed than these to have these operations done. Strangely, there are still chastity belts used today. However, it is used in the BDSM and dominatrix community instead of prevention for health. Typically used by a female dom to restrain a sub or slave from being able to use his penis without the dom’s consent.


[i] Moore, Crystal. “Masturbation and the Rise of Reform Physiology.” Lecture, History of Sex from UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, March 18, 2014.
[ii] Darby, Robert. "The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision: A review of the historiography - Review Essay." Circumcision Information and Resource Pages. Last modified November 11, 2006. http://www.cirp.org/library/history/darby4/.

[iii] Darby, Robert. "The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision: A review of the historiography - Review Essay." Circumcision Information and Resource Pages. Last modified November 11, 2006. http://www.cirp.org/library/history/darby4/.

[iv] Moore, Crystal. “Masturbation and the Rise of Reform Physiology.” Lecture, History of Sex from UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, March 18, 2014.
[v] Darby, Robert. "The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision: A review of the historiography - Review Essay." Circumcision Information and Resource Pages. Last modified November 11, 2006. http://www.cirp.org/library/history/darby4/.

[vi] Darby, Robert. "The masturbation taboo and the rise of routine male circumcision: A review of the historiography - Review Essay." Circumcision Information and Resource Pages. Last modified November 11, 2006. http://www.cirp.org/library/history/darby4/.

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Planned Parenthood


Planned Parenthood
 By Pratiksha Singh

I have mixed feeling about Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is an organization that helps with healthcare, sex education as well as family planning. They are known worldwide and are one of the most trusted sources of reproductive healthcare. I don’t think that teenage pregnancy should be encouraged but at the same time the girls that do get pregnant should have somewhere to go if that did happen. Although kids my age and even younger should not have sex without protection, most of them still do. I am not saying that this is okay but it is good for there to be somewhere that they can get birth control to try and prevent a pregnancy. The birth control pill is not free if you get it from Planned Parenthood; it usually costs 15-20 dollars a month depending on your health care.[1] Most parents don’t put their daughters on birth control because they don’t think their children are sexually active and a lot of kids are not open about being sexually active to their parents. Planned parenthood gives young girls the opportunity to avoid getting pregnant. It is a safe place where they can go and don’t have to be worried about getting into trouble or getting punished. Planned parenthood is also good for women that can’t afford birth control. There are multiple ways of getting birth control, through a patch, from the pill, from a ring, from a sponge and from a patch.[1] Planned parenthood not only is helpful with birth control but it is helpful with abortion, the morning after pill, sex education and many more things. [1] I don’t think that its wrong that Planned Parenthood provides young women the option of being able to get birth control. If a girl is sexually active and is not comfortable with telling her parents then I think its better to be safe instead of continuing to have sex and not be on the pill. Being afraid to talk to your parents about your sexual life is very common, a lot of parents are not accepting to the fact that their child is sexually active. Planned parenthood gives girls the option of taking steps to try and be as safe as possible. I definitely think that going behind your parents back is not the right thing to do but most girls don’t want to stop being sexually active so the next step is practicing safe sex. Although Planned Parenthood sounds very helpful some people think they send the wrong message and they just say things to make themselves look good. They may leave out details when talking to teens about sex and the risks of certain medications.[2] A lot of people also think teens or women should just abstain from sex and that would avoid having to take birth control all together. [2] 


[1] Planned Parenthood, Accessed February 16, 2014. http://www.plannedparenthood.org.
[2] Chastity. com, "What's so Bad About Planned Parenthood?." Accessed February 18, 2014. http://chastity.com/chastity-qa/birth-control/abortion/whats-so-bad-about-planne.